smartphonepoy.blogg.se

1. WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER INSTALL
2. WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER FULL
3. WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER SOFTWARE
4. WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER PLUS
5. WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER ZIP

WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER INSTALL

Beta Channel Installation Debian, Ubuntu, Mint sudo apt install apt-transport-https curl Our official package repositories do so instead of using the Snap. We currently recommend that users who are able to use

While it is maintained by Brave Software, it is not yet working asĪs our official packages. You can find Brave in the Snapcraft Store, but Sudo zypper addrepo -refresh brave-browser Sudo curl -fsSLo /usr/share/keyrings/brave-browser-archive-keyring.gpg Įcho "deb stable main"|sudo tee /etc/apt//brave-browser-release.listįedora, CentOS Stream/RHEL sudo dnf install dnf-plugins-core sudo apt install apt-transport-https curl If you get gnutls_handshake() errors after adding the Brave repository on Debian 9, you may need to uninstall old conflicting packages. Release Channel Installation Debian, Ubuntu, Mint The current signing keys are also available from. Brave is only supported on 64-bit AMD/Intel architectures (amd64 / x86_64). So one have to wait and see - how has written…. but I read somewhere here, that this version is also outdated and updates are not possible. Ps: i guess, only the non-official ff - nightly flatpak can handle wayland at the moment. So one has no choice but to use ff at the moment (and plays around with the config for half an hour) or go to the very dark side of power and layer chromium (and i won’t go into google chrome at all). maybe this has already been fixed because of the bad press - i don’t know. also there were/are some other problems with brave: special facebook-connections not blocked, a questionable header, et cetera. brave indeed looks horrible (from the mentioned aesthetic point of view) on sb/gnome. The “ungoogled-chromium” appimage is based on an ancient chromium version and contains a questionable extension which can’t be removed and the (previously excellent) irdidium - browser won’t be further developed (as it seems). and currently there is no alternative (except ff, which i don’t want to use) if you don’t want google to spy on you.

WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER SOFTWARE

The browser is the most used software (for regular users). is the “normal” - version more up-to-date?

I think I just convinced myself to give Epiphany another epiphany is available as flatpak, but quite outdated. I have been hearing for a while that work on Chromium Wayland is “close” but that doesn’t mean it will make it to Brave. Epiphany doesn’t have that problem.ģ - Not Wayland.

WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER FULL

Unless I am browsing full screen, I need to enable the system titlebar in order to drag browser windows, which, well - see my point above. Epiphany’s latest release is the best I have seen from an integration/aesthetics standpoint.Ģ - I use a 2 in 1 laptop and browse often in tablet mode. It’s on par with other Chromium clones and with Firefox, but still breaks up my desktop experience a bit. I’ve been running the latest nightly and am very pleased with the performance, love that I can use Chrome extensions, and certainly am sold on “Brave Rewards,” so I am using it for now.ġ - From an aesthetic standpoint, it doesn’t integrate that well with Gnome. I have questioned whether Brave is worth all the effort as well. i just wonder right now if brave is worth it. finally it will be a “community-maintained” flatpak solution.

WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER ZIP

Hx … well, then i do not try it via toolbox and download the zip file. So what approach do you take if your favorite piece of software isn’t exactly Silverblue friendly? I suppose I could install in a toolbox container and put together a script to launch it (called from a desktop file) but not sure what that buys me.

WHY I CANT DOWNLOAD BRAVE BROWSER PLUS

I was able to install a binary release of Brave from their github releases into my home directory and hack up a desktop file to launch it, so that is working for now (no updates, plus I may be missing stuff I am not even aware of). I have no interest in running it with -no-sandbox for security reasons. I’ve attempted to work on building out a flatpak for Brave, but don’t know enough at the moment to get around the sandboxing issue with Chromium based browsers.

I’m also trying to keep my Silverblue install as “pure” as possible, so am avoiding adding additional repos, including both 3rd party and rpmfusion. The rpm available for Brave installs to /opt, so currently can’t be overlaid in Silverblue (unless that changed very recently). I just wanted to see what folks are doing with software that currently can’t be installed with either rpm-ostree or flatpak.